Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

The Kensington

Walnut Creek, CA · ~106 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Kensington runs at 494% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Kensington: 18.8 TCR = 494% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Kensington safety composite

The Kensington scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.9

2017→2024

The Kensington injury rate improved

The Kensington's TCR fell 11.9 from 25.2 in 2017 to 13.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 30.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=25.2 · 2018=13.8 · 2019=14.8 · 2020=23.9 · 2021=30.7 · 2022=17.3 · 2023=11.1 · 2024=13.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Walnut Creek, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 18.8 · 494% of ind

  • DART 13.3 DART
  • RANK #562/635
  • PHOTO Summerfield Senior L…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 106 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Summerfield Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

The Kensington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Kensington averages 18.8 TCR (494% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Kensington TCR series: 2017=25.2 · 2018=13.8 · 2019=14.8 · 2020=23.9 · 2021=30.7 · 2022=17.3 · 2023=11.1 · 2024=13.3 · BLS 3.8

Where The Kensington falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #562 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

The Kensington (106 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Kensington
The Kensington (106 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Kensington has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.3 13.3 8 0 0
2023 11.1 11.1 10 0 0
2022 17.3 15.4 7 2 0
2021 30.7 17.0 19 8 0
2020 23.9 19.4 12 9 0
2019 14.8 9.9 15 0 0
2018 13.8 7.5 13 0 0
2017 25.2 11.4 22 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Walnut Creek

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 119 employers in Walnut Creek, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Summerfield Senior Living 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avamere Sherwood 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Pearl at Dallas 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carolina Reserve of Durham 18.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE D & J Farm Management LLC 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robinson Calf Ranch 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monte Vista Farming Company LLC. 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Empire Farm Labor Contracting, Inc 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 522 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 523 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121551 2,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR 02821551 WALNUT CREEK HOSPITAL 1,924 FTE
NAT-TCR Burlington Vt - 036 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR County of Eaton 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Crossroads Galvanizing 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0757 Fort Wayne 18.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Metal Arc, Inc. 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cadiz Crude Fleet 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valeron Strength Films 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE EnovaPremier of Kentucky LLC 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.