Food Service Contractors · California

Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan

Placentia, CA · ~34 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan: 2.6 TCR = 86% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan safety composite

Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2017→2022

Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan injury rate improved

Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan's TCR fell 5.4 from 5.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=7.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Placentia, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 86% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #155/586
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT POINT LOMA…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT POINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan averages 2.6 TCR (86% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan TCR series: 2017=5.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=7.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #155 safest of 586 Food Service Contractors employers in California.

Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan (34 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan
Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan (34 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan has fewer employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · CA · Placentia

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 51 employers in Placentia, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT POINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WHITMAN-CLEVELAND CM 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT OUR LADY OF LOURDES RMC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toledo-Chick Fil-A 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ardent Mills Yuba City 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Filice Farms, L.P. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alexander Ranch, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE MFarms 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-430 484 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heritage Plastering, Inc 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arlon Graphics, LLC 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Placentia 208 FTE
NAT-TCR International Paper Pine Hill Mill 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR D L George and Sons Transportation, Inc 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Ou Medical Center - Edmond 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Can Shed LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Usmc-E Mh 590 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Jsu - Marketplace 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.