Building Cleaning/Maintenance · Arizona

Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities

Phoenix, AZ · ~34 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Building Cleaning/Maintenance workplace, earning a grade D.

Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities: 5.5 TCR = 123% of Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities safety composite

Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2017→2022

Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities injury rate improved

Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities's TCR fell 6.4 from 6.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.4 · 2018=14.5 · 2019=5.9 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 123% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #43/69
  • PHOTO Maxwell Air Force Co…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maxwell Air Force Commissary (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities averages 5.5 TCR (123% of the Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities TCR series: 2017=6.4 · 2018=14.5 · 2019=5.9 · 2021=1 · 2022=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities falls in its industry

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 69 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers in Arizona.

Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities (34 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities
Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities (34 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at Imagine Schools Facilities has fewer employees than the Building Cleaning/Maintenance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 5.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 14.5 0.0 3 0 0
2017 6.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · AZ · Phoenix

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maxwell Air Force Commissary 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Patricio Plaza 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1851 South High 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR County of Ventura Custodial 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rio Blanco, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ashton Woods Arizona LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meritage Homes of South Carolina - Coastal Division 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR el super #17 Slauson 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Miles Sand & Gravel Company 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Aero Tech, LLC 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Universal Parks and Resorts : USH/CW 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Tenet Placentia Linda Hosp Fan 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Can Shed LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Usmc-E Mh 590 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Jsu - Marketplace 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.