Food Service Contractors · North Carolina

Sodexo at Uncpembroke Chick Fil a

Pembroke, NC · ~68 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Uncpembroke Chick Fil a runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at Uncpembroke Chick Fil a: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Uncpembroke Chick Fil a safety composite

Sodexo at Uncpembroke Chick Fil a scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sodexo at Uncpembroke Chick Fil a held a steady TCR band

Sodexo at Uncpembroke Chick Fil a's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Pembroke, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/214
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT CHRISTEL H…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT CHRISTEL HOUSE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Uncpembroke Chick Fil a in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Uncpembroke Chick Fil a averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Uncpembroke Chick Fil a TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Uncpembroke Chick Fil a falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 214 Food Service Contractors employers in North Carolina.

Sodexo at Uncpembroke Chick Fil a (68 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Uncpembroke Chick Fil a
Sodexo at Uncpembroke Chick Fil a (68 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Uncpembroke Chick Fil a has more employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · NC · Pembroke

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 15 employers in Pembroke, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT CHRISTEL HOUSE 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT REHABILITAION HOSP INDIANA 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAP AMERICA HQ 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT SPAULDING REHAB HOSPITAL F/N 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pittsboro 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asheville Skyland Fossil and CT Plants 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rehab Builders, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE KRG Utility, Inc 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pembroke 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steven Charles Pembroke 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5489 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5489 245 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Christel House 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Erlanger Pob Es 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Rehabilitaion Hosp Indiana 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR District of Columbia 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Creighton Univ 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Tidelands Waccamaw Food 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Telenet Voip, Inc. 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hazleton Division 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.