Food Service Contractors · Texas

Sodexo at Ut Tyler Resident Dining

Tyler, TX · ~122 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Ut Tyler Resident Dining runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Sodexo at Ut Tyler Resident Dining: 2.4 TCR = 79% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Ut Tyler Resident Dining safety composite

Sodexo at Ut Tyler Resident Dining scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2016→2024

Sodexo at Ut Tyler Resident Dining injury rate improved

Sodexo at Ut Tyler Resident Dining's TCR fell 5.2 from 5.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.2 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Tyler, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #203/570
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT ARIZONA WE…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT ARIZONA WESTERN MAIN FEE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Ut Tyler Resident Dining in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Ut Tyler Resident Dining averages 2.4 TCR (79% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Ut Tyler Resident Dining TCR series: 2016=5.2 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=0 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Ut Tyler Resident Dining falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #203 safest of 570 Food Service Contractors employers in Texas.

Sodexo at Ut Tyler Resident Dining (122 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Ut Tyler Resident Dining
Sodexo at Ut Tyler Resident Dining (122 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Ut Tyler Resident Dining has more employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.8 0.9 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.5 0.0 2 0 0
2017 5.4 0.0 2 0 0
2016 5.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · TX · Tyler

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 357 employers in Tyler, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT ARIZONA WESTERN MAIN FEE 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR INTUIT SD 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Humboldt SD 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beloit College Cafe 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Iron Horse Tools, Inc. 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Benito SC 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lubbock Operations Center-119 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amarillo Technical Center-122 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler - CTMF 380 3,897 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Main Hospital 2,205 FTE
CITY-NEAR Residential HVAC and Supply : MFG-Tyler,TX-USA 2,173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trinity Clinic - CTMF 381 1,705 FTE
NAT-TCR Mac's Construction Company Incorporated 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Inn At Depauw 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR American & Efird Gastonia Plant 20 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Conneaut Medical Center 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Super Foodtown of Red Bank - 267 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midway 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kearsley Operator LP 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.