Facilities Support Services · Iowa

Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm

Oskaloosa, IA · ~30 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm runs at 298% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Facilities Support Services workplace, earning a grade F.

Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm: 7.8 TCR = 298% of Facilities Support Services BLS 2.6 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm safety composite

Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.3

2017→2024

Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm injury rate improved

Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm's TCR fell 15.3 from 15.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 21.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.3 · 2018=21.6 · 2019=14.9 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · Oskaloosa, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 298% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT LEWIS UNIV…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT LEWIS UNIVERSITY-FM (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm averages 7.8 TCR (298% of the Facilities Support Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm TCR series: 2017=15.3 · 2018=21.6 · 2019=14.9 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm falls in its industry

757 Facilities Support Services establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Facilities Support Services employers in Iowa.

Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm (30 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm
Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm (30 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm has fewer employees than the Facilities Support Services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 14.9 7.4 2 0 0
2018 21.6 14.4 3 0 0
2017 15.3 15.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · IA · Oskaloosa

757 Facilities Support Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 37 employers in Oskaloosa, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT LEWIS UNIVERSITY-FM 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Department of Enterprise Services - Buildings & Grounds 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MJM Holdings, Inc 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 000005277 - GRADY HOSPITAL EVS 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beck's Mount Pleasant 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iowa Laborers 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Keokuk Plant 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kading Construction Company Inc 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Musco Sports Lighting, LLC / Corporate Office 625 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mahaska County Hospital 558 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mahaska County Hospital dba Mahaska Health Partnership 458 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Office 291 FTE
NAT-TCR Landmark Snacks 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Swiss Chalet Hotel & Suites 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Methodist Home of the South Georgia Conference Inc - Macon Campus 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Vallarta Supermarkets #37 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE District Wide 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knapheide Equipment Company Store 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salida Ag Chem Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro Transit Northstar 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.