Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Minnesota

Metro Transit Northstar

Big Lake, MN · ~30 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metro Transit Northstar runs at 151% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade D.

Metro Transit Northstar: 6.8 TCR = 151% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metro Transit Northstar safety composite

Metro Transit Northstar scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2017→2024

Metro Transit Northstar injury rate improved

Metro Transit Northstar's TCR fell 11.6 from 14.9 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.9 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=9.5 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=8.9 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Big Lake, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.8 · 151% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #13/18
  • PHOTO NTF
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NTF (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Metro Transit Northstar in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metro Transit Northstar averages 6.8 TCR (151% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metro Transit Northstar TCR series: 2017=14.9 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=9.5 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=8.9 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Metro Transit Northstar falls in its industry

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 18 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in Minnesota.

Metro Transit Northstar (30 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Metro Transit Northstar
Metro Transit Northstar (30 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Metro Transit Northstar has fewer employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2023 8.9 8.9 2 0 0
2022 9.8 9.8 2 0 0
2021 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2020 9.5 9.5 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2017 14.9 8.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · MN · Big Lake

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 31 employers in Big Lake, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NTF 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1361 BUS OVERHAUL PROGRAM 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Four Mile Run Bus Facility 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nelson Nursery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Westland Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pipestone Grow Finish 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Limited 849 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2031 Coborn's Big Lake 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR Premier Marine LLC 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR AES Arconic Big Lake 125 FTE
NAT-TCR Torrington Wyoming Facility 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Etw East Earl 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Alexandria 057 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR York Correctional Institution 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Knapheide Equipment Company Store 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bruewer Woodwork Mfg Co. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyatt Regency Harborside 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at William Penn University Ifm 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.