Building Cleaning/Maintenance · Maryland

Sodexo at Woodlawn Svc Corp-Ssa West Cam

Baltimore, MD · ~39 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Woodlawn Svc Corp-Ssa West Cam runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building Cleaning/Maintenance workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at Woodlawn Svc Corp-Ssa West Cam: 0.9 TCR = 21% of Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Woodlawn Svc Corp-Ssa West Cam safety composite

Sodexo at Woodlawn Svc Corp-Ssa West Cam scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2018→2022

Sodexo at Woodlawn Svc Corp-Ssa West Cam injury rate improved

Sodexo at Woodlawn Svc Corp-Ssa West Cam's TCR fell 3.7 from 3.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Baltimore, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/52
  • PHOTO CBRE Eli Lilly
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CBRE Eli Lilly (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Woodlawn Svc Corp-Ssa West Cam in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Woodlawn Svc Corp-Ssa West Cam averages 0.9 TCR (21% of the Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Woodlawn Svc Corp-Ssa West Cam TCR series: 2018=3.7 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at Woodlawn Svc Corp-Ssa West Cam falls in its industry

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 52 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers in Maryland.

Sodexo at Woodlawn Svc Corp-Ssa West Cam (39 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Woodlawn Svc Corp-Ssa West Cam
Sodexo at Woodlawn Svc Corp-Ssa West Cam (39 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at Woodlawn Svc Corp-Ssa West Cam has fewer employees than the Building Cleaning/Maintenance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · MD · Baltimore

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CBRE Eli Lilly 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnolia Regional Health Cente 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp - BBS 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PMI / Custodial Dept. at LANL 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Maryland Division Office 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHRG MD-BAL 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Point Builders of Maryland 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clevenger Interiors, LLC. 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Keys Anderson 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwin CO 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Haines Transportation Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cianbro Equipment LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Pom 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Nas - Constitution Ave 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wedgewood Terrace Assisted Living 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Cal Lutheran - Starbucks 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.