Cups, plastics (except foam), manufacturing · Georgia

Solo Cup Company Thomaston

Thomaston, GA · ~196 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Solo Cup Company Thomaston runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cups, plastics (except foam), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Solo Cup Company Thomaston: 1.5 TCR = 44% of Cups, plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Solo Cup Company Thomaston safety composite

Solo Cup Company Thomaston scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Solo Cup Company Thomaston held a steady TCR band

Solo Cup Company Thomaston's TCR held near 0.1 from 2.3 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Thomaston, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 44% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #18/103
  • PHOTO Perfect Plastic Prin…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~196 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Perfect Plastic Printing Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Solo Cup Company Thomaston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Solo Cup Company Thomaston averages 1.5 TCR (44% of the Cups, plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Solo Cup Company Thomaston TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Solo Cup Company Thomaston falls in its industry

2,838 Cups, plastics (except foam), establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 103 Cups, plastics (except foam), employers in Georgia.

Solo Cup Company Thomaston (196 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Solo Cup Company Thomaston
Solo Cup Company Thomaston (196 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Solo Cup Company Thomaston has more employees than the Cups, plastics (except foam), manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.6 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2020 1.7 1.1 2 1 0
2019 2.8 2.5 8 0 0
2018 2.7 2.3 7 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.3 1.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · GA · Thomaston

2,838 Cups, plastics (except foam), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 28 employers in Thomaston, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Perfect Plastic Printing Corporation 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR URGENT PLASTIC SERVICES 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR WNA-Lancaster 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sterling 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beasley Timber Company 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE Industrial Mechanical, Inc. 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milliken - Valway Plant 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWA 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1112 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1112 298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Standard Textile, Thomaston 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR Interfor Thomaston Division 149 FTE
NAT-TCR Effingham Asphalt Company, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR McGinnis Wood Products, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR INDC Fleet 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR East Kent Hdqtrs 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 600 Northern Blvd 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE Abilene (BAMG) 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Bakery 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pitt Ohio - Allentown 196 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.