Barrel heading and staves manufacturing · Missouri

McGinnis Wood Products, Inc.

Cuba, MO · ~170 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

McGinnis Wood Products, Inc. runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Barrel heading and staves manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

McGinnis Wood Products, Inc.: 1.5 TCR = 44% of Barrel heading and staves manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

McGinnis Wood Products, Inc. safety composite

McGinnis Wood Products, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

McGinnis Wood Products, Inc.: 1.1 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

McGinnis Wood Products, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.9 from 1.1 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Cuba, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/27
  • PHOTO MEP Operation on Cr …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~170 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MEP Operation on Cr 207 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

McGinnis Wood Products, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows McGinnis Wood Products, Inc. averages 1.5 TCR (44% of the Barrel heading and staves manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

McGinnis Wood Products, Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where McGinnis Wood Products, Inc. falls in its industry

952 Barrel heading and staves manu establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 27 Barrel heading and staves manu employers in Missouri.

McGinnis Wood Products, Inc. (170 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate McGinnis Wood Products, Inc.
McGinnis Wood Products, Inc. (170 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

McGinnis Wood Products, Inc. has more employees than the Barrel heading and staves manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 0.0 4 0 0
2023 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2022 1.7 0.9 4 0 0
2021 1.6 1.1 3 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2019 1.6 0.5 3 0 0
2018 2.1 1.1 4 0 0
2017 1.6 0.0 3 0 0
2016 1.1 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · MO · Cuba

952 Barrel heading and staves manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 23 employers in Cuba, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MEP Operation on Cr 207 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recycled Richmond (UT1R) 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recycled Atlanta (USST) 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neville Manufacturing Service and Distribution Inc 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - Raytown Customer Service Center 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE NewGround International, Inc. 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE ITC Missouri 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE Federal-Mogul Maryville Manufacturing 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meramec Instrument Transformer Co./Hubbell Power Systems 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meramec Instrument Transformer Company 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR MISOURRI 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR LMI - Cuba 125 FTE
NAT-TCR Carus LLC - LaSalle 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Effingham Asphalt Company, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Solo Cup Company Thomaston 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR INDC Fleet 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE HES Corporate 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clear Lake Oxbo 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint-Gobain 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coldspring Transitional Care Center 170 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.