Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Solstice Senior Living at Auburn

Auburn, CA · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Solstice Senior Living at Auburn runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Solstice Senior Living at Auburn: 2.5 TCR = 66% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Solstice Senior Living at Auburn safety composite

Solstice Senior Living at Auburn scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Solstice Senior Living at Auburn: 0.0 → 10.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Solstice Senior Living at Auburn's TCR rose 10.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 10.0 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Auburn, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/635
  • PHOTO Solera Senior Living
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Solera Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Solstice Senior Living at Auburn in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Solstice Senior Living at Auburn averages 2.5 TCR (66% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Solstice Senior Living at Auburn TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=10 · BLS 3.8

Where Solstice Senior Living at Auburn falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Solstice Senior Living at Auburn (34 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Solstice Senior Living at Auburn
Solstice Senior Living at Auburn (34 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Solstice Senior Living at Auburn has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 10.0 0.0 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Auburn

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 96 employers in Auburn, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Solera Senior Living 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waltonwood Carriage Park IL 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10458 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cinco Ranch Alz 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ardent Mills Yuba City 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Filice Farms, L.P. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alexander Ranch, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE MFarms 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 37 2,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30095) 762 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health and Human Services 743 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital (110-4001) 676 FTE
NAT-TCR CEDA Central 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Limbach - New England 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 764 Coronado Center 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6795-99625B0499 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Solstice Senior Living at Fenton 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solstice Senior Living at Grand Valley 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE The High Line Hotel LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Upstate Steel Inc. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.