Non-destructive testing laboratories or services · North Carolina

Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group

Wilmington, NC · ~319 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Non-destructive testing laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade D.

Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group: 0.7 TCR = 138% of Non-destructive testing laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group safety composite

Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2019→2020

Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group injury rate improved

Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.9 in 2019 to 0.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.9 · 2020=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541380 · Wilmington, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 0.7 · 138% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK P64
  • PHOTO Tulsa FS (O&G) - 1777
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~319 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tulsa FS (O&G) - 1777 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group averages 0.7 TCR (138% of the Non-destructive testing laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group TCR series: 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.5 · BLS 0.5

Where Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group falls in its industry

232 Non-destructive testing labora establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group (319 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group
Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group (319 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0

Sonic Systems International - Energy Services Group has more employees than the Non-destructive testing laboratories or median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.5 0.2 2 0 0
2019 0.9 0.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541380 · NC · Wilmington

232 Non-destructive testing laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 360 employers in Wilmington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tulsa FS (O&G) - 1777 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bloomington - BIC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AMERICAS 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chelsea Proving Grounds 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE AC Corporation - GSO 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE Culp Home Fashions 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flowserve Corporation 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE AIR SYSTEM COMPONENTS INC 319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center 6,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hanover Regional Medical Center 4,768 FTE
CITY-NEAR GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas 1,975 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hanover County Government 1,974 FTE
NAT-TCR Agrana Fruit US, Inc. Brecksville 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR LSC Communications - Appleton 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR August Mack Environmental Lewis Center 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dow AgroSciences Harbor Beach Site 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Volunteer Behavioral Health Care Services-Cookeville Plateau 319 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meijer 108 319 FTE
NAT-SIZE Windsor Office 319 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monogram Aerospace Fasteners - Commerce 319 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.