Distribution of electric power · Alabama

South Alabama Electric Cooperative

Troy, AL · ~55 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

South Alabama Electric Cooperative runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade C.

South Alabama Electric Cooperative: 1.3 TCR = 108% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

South Alabama Electric Cooperative safety composite

South Alabama Electric Cooperative scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

South Alabama Electric Cooperative held a steady TCR band

South Alabama Electric Cooperative's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.7 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Troy, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.3 · 108% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/138
  • PHOTO Singing River Electr…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Singing River Electric Cooperative - Lucedale Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

South Alabama Electric Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows South Alabama Electric Cooperative averages 1.3 TCR (108% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

South Alabama Electric Cooperative TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 1.2

Where South Alabama Electric Cooperative falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 138 Distribution of electric power employers in Alabama.

South Alabama Electric Cooperative (55 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate South Alabama Electric Cooperative
South Alabama Electric Cooperative (55 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

South Alabama Electric Cooperative has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.1 0.0 2 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · AL · Troy

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 52 employers in Troy, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Singing River Electric Cooperative - Lucedale Office 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clatskanie People's Utility District 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edisto Electric Cooperative, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR GVEC Seguin 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE GP Egg Depot (Elkmont) 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Covington Electric Cooperative Inc. - Sanford Office 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Stewart/Perry Company, Inc. 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weaver Bessemer 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Troy Campus (1046) 551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US AL Troy 299 Airport Blvd (5209) 483 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sanders Lead Company, Inc. 478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Troy 390 FTE
NAT-TCR Lake Havasu City County Complex 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR American Weldquip, LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fotofab 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR S10284 - Albany Hauling 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ron Marhofer Nissan 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE STERIS Erlanger Outsource 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Angus Asphalt Inc. 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Laurels of Chagrin Falls 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.