Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire · California

South Bay Cable Corp. - Temecula

Temecula, CA · ~64 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

South Bay Cable Corp. - Temecula runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire workplace, earning a grade A.

South Bay Cable Corp. - Temecula: 1.1 TCR = 34% of Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

South Bay Cable Corp. - Temecula safety composite

South Bay Cable Corp. - Temecula scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

South Bay Cable Corp. - Temecula: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.46× in 2019

South Bay Cable Corp. - Temecula's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335929 · Temecula, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 34% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #2/8
  • PHOTO South Bay Cable Corp…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: South Bay Cable Corp. - Idyllwild (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

South Bay Cable Corp. - Temecula in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows South Bay Cable Corp. - Temecula averages 1.1 TCR (34% of the Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

South Bay Cable Corp. - Temecula TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where South Bay Cable Corp. - Temecula falls in its industry

144 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 8 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, employers in California.

South Bay Cable Corp. - Temecula (64 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate South Bay Cable Corp. - Temecula
South Bay Cable Corp. - Temecula (64 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3

South Bay Cable Corp. - Temecula has fewer employees than the Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335929 · CA · Temecula

144 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 164 employers in Temecula, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR South Bay Cable Corp. - Idyllwild 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southwire DCN 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Draka Elevator Products, Inc. - Rocy Mount 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Cable Corporation 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms, Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDERA 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGS FARM LABOR CORPORATION 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arroyo Seco Vineyards, Inc 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR AV Temecula Campus 1,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR AV-Temecula Campus 1,493 FTE
CITY-NEAR 289 TEMECULA VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC.-TEMECULA VALLEY HOSPITAL 1,200 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-289 726 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookfield Hampton Inn 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Puyallup 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR AMAMCO Tool 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Saint-Gobain Ceramics and Plastics 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE D-Kerns Construction Inc. 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chillicothe Service Center 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roofing Systems of Maine, A Tecta America Company 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1250 Greensburg Rd 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.