Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Florida

South Hillsborough Service Area

Tampa, FL · ~57 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

South Hillsborough Service Area runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade C.

South Hillsborough Service Area: 1.0 TCR = 87% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

South Hillsborough Service Area safety composite

South Hillsborough Service Area scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

South Hillsborough Service Area: 1.0 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 2.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

South Hillsborough Service Area's TCR rose 1.1 from 1.0 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Tampa, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.0 · 87% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/43
  • PHOTO Noblesville Generati…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Noblesville Generating Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

South Hillsborough Service Area in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows South Hillsborough Service Area averages 1.0 TCR (87% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

South Hillsborough Service Area TCR series: 2016=1 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.1 · BLS 1.2

Where South Hillsborough Service Area falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 43 Electric power generation, fos employers in Florida.

South Hillsborough Service Area (57 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate South Hillsborough Service Area
South Hillsborough Service Area (57 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

South Hillsborough Service Area has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2016 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · FL · Tampa

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Noblesville Generating Station 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00535 CEDAR CITY SERV CTR 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSE, NSO - North Seattle Operations 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR West County Energy Center 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quincy, FL Complex 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE DSC South Campus 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeast Orlando Operations Center 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boynton Beach SS & Storm 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR SAC Corporate 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Turner at Formosa Plastics Corporation Baton Rouge LA 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR W. G. Sullivan Lumber Co., Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lifetime Benefit Solutions - Techniplex 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Martin Systems Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE XPO Logistics - PHOENIX 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Staples Auburn FC and SDO 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loop Paper Recycling LLC. 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.