Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Washington

Staples Auburn FC and SDO

Auburn, WA · ~57 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Staples Auburn FC and SDO runs at 241% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Staples Auburn FC and SDO: 15.7 TCR = 241% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Staples Auburn FC and SDO safety composite

Staples Auburn FC and SDO scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.0

2018→2020

Staples Auburn FC and SDO injury rate improved

Staples Auburn FC and SDO's TCR fell 16.0 from 27.1 in 2018 to 11.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 27.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=27.1 · 2019=8.9 · 2020=11.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Auburn, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.7 · 241% of ind

  • DART 11.0 DART
  • RANK #127/168
  • PHOTO Key Remnant Delivery…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Key Remnant Delivery Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Staples Auburn FC and SDO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Staples Auburn FC and SDO averages 15.7 TCR (241% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Staples Auburn FC and SDO TCR series: 2018=27.1 · 2019=8.9 · 2020=11 · BLS 6.5

Where Staples Auburn FC and SDO falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #127 safest of 168 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Washington.

Staples Auburn FC and SDO (57 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Staples Auburn FC and SDO
Staples Auburn FC and SDO (57 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Staples Auburn FC and SDO has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 11.0 11.0 6 0 0
2019 8.9 7.4 6 0 0
2018 27.1 27.1 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · WA · Auburn

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 166 employers in Auburn, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Key Remnant Delivery Inc 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 833 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5-Star Delivery LLC. 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DYR3 15.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vignoble 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dilley & Soloman Logging 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE FV Katie Ann 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shold Excavating, Inc. 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA001 4,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zones, LLC 1,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR Muckleshoot Casino 1,616 FTE
CITY-NEAR Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR Hillcrest Health Care and Rehabilitation Center 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Marina Del Rey Hotel 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Omega Home 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR LA 104 Lois Road 15.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Loop Paper Recycling LLC. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kaiser Electrical Contractors, Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martin Systems Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : RDM - Redmond-Bend 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.