Solid waste landfills combined with collection and/or local hauling of nonhazardous waste materials · Utah

South Utah Valley Solid Waste District

Spanish Fork, UT · ~45 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

South Utah Valley Solid Waste District runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Solid waste landfills combined with collection and/or local hauling of nonhazardous waste materials workplace, earning a grade D.

South Utah Valley Solid Waste District: 3.9 TCR = 150% of Solid waste landfills combined with collection and/or local hauling of nonhazardous waste materials BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

South Utah Valley Solid Waste District safety composite

South Utah Valley Solid Waste District scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

South Utah Valley Solid Waste District: 0.0 → 11.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.77× in 2024

South Utah Valley Solid Waste District's TCR rose 11.5 from 0.0 in 2021 to 11.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562212 · Spanish Fork, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.9 · 150% of ind

  • DART 6.9 DART
  • RANK P50
  • PHOTO Vasco Road Landfill
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vasco Road Landfill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

South Utah Valley Solid Waste District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows South Utah Valley Solid Waste District averages 3.9 TCR (150% of the Solid waste landfills combined with collection and/or local hauling of nonhazardous waste materials BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

South Utah Valley Solid Waste District TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0.2 · 2024=11.5 · BLS 2.6

Where South Utah Valley Solid Waste District falls in its industry

288 Solid waste landfills combined establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
South Utah Valley Solid Waste District (45 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate South Utah Valley Solid Waste District
South Utah Valley Solid Waste District (45 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9

South Utah Valley Solid Waste District has more employees than the Solid waste landfills combined with coll median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.5 6.9 5 0 0
2022 0.2 0.1 7 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562212 · UT · Spanish Fork

288 Solid waste landfills combined with collection and/or local hauling of nonhazardous waste materials employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 49 employers in Spanish Fork, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vasco Road Landfill 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR S04108 - Simi Valley Landfill 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR GFL Environmental Brent Run Landfill 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Modern Disposal Buffalo Recycling Enterprises 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Symphony Homes 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE SLC-DWH-SALT LAKE CITY 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE COP Construction 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Randy Marriott Construction 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sunroc Corporation 1,190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Young Living Essential Oils - DC 1,107 FTE
CITY-NEAR YLEO Distribution Centers 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nature's Sunshine Manufacturing facility 355 FTE
NAT-TCR Korvis LLC 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bear Creek Services, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairfield Chair 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR South Sound Radiology 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hegins, PA - 79 Park Lane 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE 30625 - Capstone 99 Cent Only Vernon CA 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rohsler's Allendale Nursery 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Powell 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.