General warehousing and storage · South Carolina

Southeast Logistics Service Center

Fountain Inn, SC · ~24 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southeast Logistics Service Center runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Southeast Logistics Service Center: 0.6 TCR = 10% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southeast Logistics Service Center safety composite

Southeast Logistics Service Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Southeast Logistics Service Center held a steady TCR band

Southeast Logistics Service Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Fountain Inn, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/160
  • PHOTO Customer Service Gro…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Customer Service Group Carson City Velocity Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Southeast Logistics Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southeast Logistics Service Center averages 0.6 TCR (10% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southeast Logistics Service Center TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Southeast Logistics Service Center falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 160 General warehousing and storag employers in South Carolina.

Southeast Logistics Service Center (24 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Southeast Logistics Service Center
Southeast Logistics Service Center (24 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Southeast Logistics Service Center has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.9 0.0 0 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · SC · Fountain Inn

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 42 employers in Fountain Inn, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Customer Service Group Carson City Velocity Center 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LBC Houston Bayport Terminal 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR TX - Boeing Kitting Center 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1552 GEODIS LOGISTICS 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE ISE Newberry Silverstreet Processing 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Timberlands 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aiken Substation/Transmission 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meter Lab (Columbia) 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bosch Rexroth FniP 957 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC/FniP Fountain Inn 900 FTE
CITY-NEAR AVX Corporation 684 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fountain Inn 655 FTE
NAT-TCR BrandSafway Industries, LLC - Huntington - Branch 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Shelbey Service Cemter 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 3M DeKalb - DSI 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 104983 - Myrtle PV Solar 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Red Oak 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakland Park Clr Ctr Outlet - #931 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boss Communication Technologies Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kingston Terminal 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.