Skilled nursing facilities · Texas

Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

San Antonio, TX · ~61 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 4.8 TCR = 73% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2019→2020

Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 4.3 from 6.9 in 2019 to 2.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.9 · 2020=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · San Antonio, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.8 · 73% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #585/1034
  • PHOTO St. Anne's Nursing C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St. Anne's Nursing Center and Residence (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center averages 4.8 TCR (73% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2019=6.9 · 2020=2.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #585 safest of 1034 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Texas.

Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (61 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (61 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Southeast Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2019 6.9 5.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · San Antonio

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St. Anne's Nursing Center and Residence 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AdventHealth Care Center Orlando East 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rehabilitation Center of Hampton 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elmwood Care Centre 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bumblebee Logistics LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMZL-NA : Gold Wing Delivery, LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Antonio Vending 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMZL-NA : Syntrik 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR 058k - Orlando 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR BR10 Milpitas 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Valley Packline Solutions, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Physical Rehab & Wellness Center of Spartanburg 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Job 230b 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Siegel Group, LLC 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE 901LNC 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.