Electric power transmission line and tower construction · North Carolina

Southeastern Transmission and Distribution

Mooresville, NC · ~22 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southeastern Transmission and Distribution runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric power transmission line and tower construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Southeastern Transmission and Distribution: 2.1 TCR = 76% of Electric power transmission line and tower construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southeastern Transmission and Distribution safety composite

Southeastern Transmission and Distribution scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Southeastern Transmission and Distribution held a steady TCR band

Southeastern Transmission and Distribution's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Mooresville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 76% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #38/79
  • PHOTO Michels Power Inc-NY…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Michels Power Inc-NY-Canton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Southeastern Transmission and Distribution in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southeastern Transmission and Distribution averages 2.1 TCR (76% of the Electric power transmission line and tower construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southeastern Transmission and Distribution TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Southeastern Transmission and Distribution falls in its industry

1,605 Electric power transmission li establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 79 Electric power transmission li employers in North Carolina.

Southeastern Transmission and Distribution (22 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Southeastern Transmission and Distribution
Southeastern Transmission and Distribution (22 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Southeastern Transmission and Distribution has fewer employees than the Electric power transmission line and tow median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 10.6 10.6 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · NC · Mooresville

1,605 Electric power transmission line and tower construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 161 employers in Mooresville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Michels Power Inc-NY-Canton 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Timberline Construction Inc. DBA FB Timberline 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ANS:ANCHM - ANCHM-Chamblee, GA 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AR 3 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE A Plus Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rock Ridge Farms Partnership 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vanguard Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE LNM - 105 -EST 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mooresville Graded School District 886 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGK Ceramics USA, Inc. 769 FTE
CITY-NEAR BestCo LLC 761 FTE
CITY-NEAR POWERHOME SOLAR 655 FTE
NAT-TCR Mummes 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rindler Poultry LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 60544 Capstone - Sysco Geneva Al 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ORD-FFM 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE HAMPTONS 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seedway - Mifflinburg 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sc Bakery Meal-Est 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE 40240 Capstone - Sysco Cleveland Oh 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.