DDSs' (doctors of dental surgery) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Minnesota

Southern Heights Dental

Faribault, MN · ~59 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southern Heights Dental runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical DDSs' (doctors of dental surgery) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade B.

Southern Heights Dental: 2.1 TCR = 56% of DDSs' (doctors of dental surgery) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southern Heights Dental safety composite

Southern Heights Dental scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Southern Heights Dental held a steady TCR band

Southern Heights Dental's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621210 · Faribault, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/29
  • PHOTO Family Dentist Tree
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Family Dentist Tree (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Southern Heights Dental in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southern Heights Dental averages 2.1 TCR (56% of the DDSs' (doctors of dental surgery) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southern Heights Dental TCR series: 2017=0 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Southern Heights Dental falls in its industry

81 DDSs' (doctors of dental surge establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 29 DDSs' (doctors of dental surge employers in Minnesota.

Southern Heights Dental (59 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 35 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Southern Heights Dental
Southern Heights Dental (59 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 35 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Southern Heights Dental has more employees than the DDSs' (doctors of dental surgery) office median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2021 4.1 2.0 2 0 0
2020 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621210 · MN · Faribault

81 DDSs' (doctors of dental surgery) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 92 employers in Faribault, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Family Dentist Tree 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR X-Ray Dental Staffing Techs of Arizona, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sturtevant 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solomon Family Dentistry 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE JDR Technologies, LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7580 Commerce Lane NE, Fridley, MN 55432 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advantage Seamless, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sauk Rapids, MN (All State) 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faribault Plant 736 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Correctional Facility-Faribault 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daikin Applied South 563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faribault Foods LLC 452 FTE
NAT-TCR Vancouver WA Yard 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pic Corp 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Adams Elementary School 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR S03783 - Phoenix Hauling - North 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Door County Coffee 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coventry Grammar School 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Universal Strap Inc 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Environmental Services, Inc 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.