Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Edgewood Alexandria

Alexandria, MN · ~59 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
30.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Edgewood Alexandria runs at 797% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Edgewood Alexandria: 30.3 TCR = 797% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Edgewood Alexandria safety composite

Edgewood Alexandria scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 30.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2019→2021

Edgewood Alexandria injury rate improved

Edgewood Alexandria's TCR fell 5.3 from 32.9 in 2019 to 27.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 141.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=32.9 · 2020=141.2 · 2021=27.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Alexandria, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 30.3 · 797% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #226/226
  • PHOTO Primrose Retirement …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Primrose Retirement Community of Jefferson City (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Edgewood Alexandria in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Edgewood Alexandria averages 30.3 TCR (797% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Edgewood Alexandria TCR series: 2019=32.9 · 2020=141.2 · 2021=27.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Edgewood Alexandria falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #226 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Edgewood Alexandria (59 employees, TCR 30.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Edgewood Alexandria
Edgewood Alexandria (59 employees, TCR 30.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Edgewood Alexandria has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 27.6 2.8 10 0 0
2020 141.2 98.3 20 36 0
2019 32.9 32.9 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Alexandria

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 86 employers in Alexandria, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Primrose Retirement Community of Jefferson City 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Blake at Edgewater 29.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Terrace 29.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Castle Peak Senior Care 29.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kennedy Elementary School 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nexus Logistics Services LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ecumen Centennial House 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benedictine Living Community - Shakopee 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Douglas County Hospital DBA Alomere Health 923 FTE
CITY-NEAR Douglas Machine Inc. 750 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexandria Extrusion Company 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexandria Technical and Community College 385 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4765-LASCXUPDH 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keeland & Corder Painting, LLC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Augustine Alligator Farm, Inc 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peace River Center - LCSU 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.