Landscape care and maintenance services · South Carolina

Southern Shade Tree Co. Inc.

Fort Mill, SC · ~134 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southern Shade Tree Co. Inc. runs at 168% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Landscape care and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Southern Shade Tree Co. Inc.: 7.5 TCR = 168% of Landscape care and maintenance services BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southern Shade Tree Co. Inc. safety composite

Southern Shade Tree Co. Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2018→2023

Southern Shade Tree Co. Inc. injury rate improved

Southern Shade Tree Co. Inc.'s TCR fell 7.1 from 12.8 in 2018 to 5.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=12.8 · 2019=7.9 · 2020=10.6 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Fort Mill, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.5 · 168% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #24/32
  • PHOTO Priority Landscape S…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Priority Landscape Services LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Southern Shade Tree Co. Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southern Shade Tree Co. Inc. averages 7.5 TCR (168% of the Landscape care and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southern Shade Tree Co. Inc. TCR series: 2018=12.8 · 2019=7.9 · 2020=10.6 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=5.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Southern Shade Tree Co. Inc. falls in its industry

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 32 Landscape care and maintenance employers in South Carolina.

Southern Shade Tree Co. Inc. (134 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Southern Shade Tree Co. Inc.
Southern Shade Tree Co. Inc. (134 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Southern Shade Tree Co. Inc. has more employees than the Landscape care and maintenance services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.7 5.7 11 1 0
2022 2.8 1.7 5 0 0
2021 5.5 5.5 8 0 0
2020 10.6 5.3 11 1 0
2019 7.9 3.9 8 0 0
2018 12.8 8.9 1 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · SC · Fort Mill

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 121 employers in Fort Mill, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Priority Landscape Services LLC 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 134031 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 131931 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Point Fermin Maintenance 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2548 LOWE S OF E. SPARTANBURG SC 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2520 LOWE S OF NEWBERRY SC 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 1812 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lowes Foods #276 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR South East Distribution Center SEDC 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR South East Distribution Center - SEDC 1,078 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shutterfly Fort Mill 841 FTE
CITY-NEAR US FOODS FORT MILL 719 FTE
NAT-TCR Monticello Flooring & Lumber Co 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR OUI 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Clinton 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Triad Fabco 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Orono ISD #278-Intermediate School 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE VRS St Paul, MN 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omaha Terminal - Hunt Transportation-DOT 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE RW Smith-Old Grove 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.