Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturing · Tennessee

Southland Brick and Block (Murfreesboro)

Murfreesboro, TN · ~34 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southland Brick and Block (Murfreesboro) runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Southland Brick and Block (Murfreesboro): 1.4 TCR = 44% of Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southland Brick and Block (Murfreesboro) safety composite

Southland Brick and Block (Murfreesboro) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Southland Brick and Block (Murfreesboro): 0.0 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2017

Southland Brick and Block (Murfreesboro)'s TCR rose 2.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327331 · Murfreesboro, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 44% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #3/10
  • PHOTO GMS Lawrenceville Ma…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GMS Lawrenceville Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Southland Brick and Block (Murfreesboro) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southland Brick and Block (Murfreesboro) averages 1.4 TCR (44% of the Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southland Brick and Block (Murfreesboro) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Southland Brick and Block (Murfreesboro) falls in its industry

321 Blocks, concrete and cinder, m establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 10 Blocks, concrete and cinder, m employers in Tennessee.

Southland Brick and Block (Murfreesboro) (34 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Southland Brick and Block (Murfreesboro)
Southland Brick and Block (Murfreesboro) (34 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Southland Brick and Block (Murfreesboro) has fewer employees than the Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327331 · TN · Murfreesboro

321 Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 256 employers in Murfreesboro, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GMS Lawrenceville Manufacturing 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Texas Best Block - HOUB 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacksonville Hardscapes 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Empire 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Obion County Hatchery 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE UCEMC Cookeville 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE RKA Construction, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGM-Tennessee 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Murfreesboro 2,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR TNNAS16 ASCENSION SAINT THOMAS RUTHERFORD 1,984 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BNA3 1,811 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BNA3 1,708 FTE
NAT-TCR Carroll House Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CentralPark 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryerson- Los Angeles 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR DSL_JACKSONVILLE_8001_FL 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Glenn E. Sessions & Sons 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haley, Chisholm & Morris, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caliber, Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1034 Southern York Co. School District 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.