Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid · Georgia

Southland Was Systems of Georgia 3620

Name: Southland Was Systems of Georgia 3620 Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Brunswick, GA · ~47 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 3.7
Avg TCR: 2.6
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southland Was Systems of Georgia 3620 runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid workplace, earning a grade D.

Southland Was Systems of Georgia 3620: 3.7 TCR = 143% of Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southland Was Systems of Georgia 3620 safety composite

Southland Was Systems of Georgia 3620 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 3.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers
DART rate: D 3.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Southland Was Systems of Georgia 3620: 2.2 → 5.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.95× in 2024

Southland Was Systems of Georgia 3620's TCR rose 3.1 from 2.2 in 2022 to 5.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Brunswick, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.7 · 143% of ind

DART 3.5 DART
RANK #45/80
PHOTO Allied Waste Service…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 4 inj
SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Allied Waste Services of Yuma (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

This site

3.7
Allied Waste S

3.7
MID FLORIDA MA

3.7
Morton Grove -

3.7
Environmental

3.7

What this shows Southland Was Systems of Georgia 3620 averages 3.7 TCR (143% of the Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid BLS benchmark).

Southland Was Systems of Georgia 3620 TCR series: 2022=2.2 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 2.6

Where Southland Was Systems of Georgia 3620 falls in its industry

2,322 Waste collection services, non establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 80 Waste collection services, non employers in Georgia.

Southland Was Systems of Georgia 3620 (47 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Southland Was Systems of Georgia 3620 has fewer employees than the Waste collection services, nonhazardous median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2024	5.3	3.5	3	0	0
2022	2.2	2.2	1	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · GA · Brunswick

2,322 Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 113 employers in Brunswick, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Allied Waste Services of Yuma	YUMA, AZ	3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	MID FLORIDA MATERIALS	OCOEE, FL	3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Morton Grove - LRS	MORTON GROVE, IL	3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Environmental Alternatives LLC	CLARKSBURG, MD	3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	SS-Harvest South	ATLANTA	47 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Athens TMC 1004 Boulevard Athens GA	ATLANTA	47 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Colquitt Electric Membership Corporation - Valdosta	VALDOSTA	47 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Austell Operating - 2525 Old Alabama Rd. Austell	ATLANTA	47 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Southeast Georgia Health System - Brunswick Campus	Brunswick	1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Brunswick	Brunswick	1,348 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Southeast Georgia Physician Associates	Brunswick	570 FTE
CITY-NEAR	GA075 Brunswick Cellulose	Brunswick	547 FTE
NAT-TCR	Minto - Hilton Head Construction, Land and Mastercare	Hardeeville, SC	3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Stryker- JR Jacksonville, FL	Jacksonville, FL	3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Doubletree Wilmington	Wilmington, DE	3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Lamont Elementary School District	Lamont, CA	3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Freeport Fire Department - City of Freeport	Freeport, IL	47 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Majestic Steel - Pittsburg	Pittsburg, CA	47 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Area Disposal Service inc. Clinton HC	Clinton, IL	47 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Xanitos EVS at Salem Regional Medical Center	Salem, OH	47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.