Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing · Michigan

Southview

Holland, MI · ~764 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southview runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Southview: 1.9 TCR = 36% of Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southview safety composite

Southview scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Southview held a steady TCR band

Southview's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.3 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.3 · 2017=1.4 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336360 · Holland, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #37/100
  • PHOTO Motus Integrated
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 104 inj
  • SIZE ~764 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Motus Integrated (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Southview in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southview averages 1.9 TCR (36% of the Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southview TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=1.4 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 5.4

Where Southview falls in its industry

384 Motor vehicle interior systems establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 100 Motor vehicle interior systems employers in Michigan.

Southview (764 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Southview
Southview (764 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Southview has more employees than the Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., he median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.3 7 1 0
2023 1.7 1.0 9 1 0
2022 2.6 2.3 16 1 0
2021 2.3 2.1 13 0 0
2020 2.1 1.6 15 0 0
2019 2.7 1.8 22 1 0
2017 1.4 0.8 11 1 0
2016 1.3 1.1 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336360 · MI · Holland

384 Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 299 employers in Holland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Motus Integrated 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR YF - Past Model Service Center 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR GRA-MAG 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR HFI, LLC Gender Road 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine 765 FTE
STATE-SIZE DETROIT NDC_1360762 761 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hollingsworth Corporate Office: Warren Ave. 761 FTE
STATE-SIZE John E. Green Company 760 FTE
CITY-NEAR LG Energy Solutions - Holland 1,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haworth HQ 1,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haworth Office 1,075 FTE
CITY-NEAR PADNOS 912 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Colonial Park 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR One Solution Logistics of Indiana 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Viking Plastics 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Electrical Systems Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Catlettsburg Refinery 764 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arnold Motor Supply 764 FTE
NAT-SIZE HCA Valley Regional Medical Center 764 FTE
NAT-SIZE Margaret Mary Health 764 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.