Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing · Nebraska

Southwark Metal - Nebraska Divison

Fremont, NE · ~147 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southwark Metal - Nebraska Divison runs at 205% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Southwark Metal - Nebraska Divison: 6.8 TCR = 205% of Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southwark Metal - Nebraska Divison safety composite

Southwark Metal - Nebraska Divison scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.9

2016→2021

Southwark Metal - Nebraska Divison injury rate improved

Southwark Metal - Nebraska Divison's TCR fell 12.9 from 14.7 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.7 · 2017=7.0 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=6.9 · 2021=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Fremont, NE ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 205% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO Nampa
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nampa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Southwark Metal - Nebraska Divison in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southwark Metal - Nebraska Divison averages 6.8 TCR (205% of the Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southwark Metal - Nebraska Divison TCR series: 2016=14.7 · 2017=7 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=3 · 2020=6.9 · 2021=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Southwark Metal - Nebraska Divison falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing employers in Nebraska.

Southwark Metal - Nebraska Divison (147 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Southwark Metal - Nebraska Divison
Southwark Metal - Nebraska Divison (147 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Southwark Metal - Nebraska Divison has more employees than the Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.8 1.8 3 0 0
2020 6.9 6.3 10 0 0
2019 3.0 1.5 4 0 0
2018 7.4 6.0 11 0 0
2017 7.0 4.9 10 0 0
2016 14.7 13.1 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · NE · Fremont

1,158 Sheet Metal Work Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 78 employers in Fremont, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nampa 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viper USA, Inc 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NIC Global-Corporate Headquarters 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4063_7778 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2611 LOWE S OF PAPILLION NE 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nye Legacy 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Attitude on Food, Inc. 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michael Foods Inc. 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wholestone Farms Cooperative Inc 1,349 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wholestone Farms 1,225 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lincoln Premium Poultry 954 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830190 METHODIST FREMONT HEALTH 674 FTE
NAT-TCR National Highway Express 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Englewood Community Hospital 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Midland, Michigan 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Drury Inn & Suites - Overland Park 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE MidMichigan Medical Center-Gladwin 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE NSA Industries 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gold Metal Recyclers LTD 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Detroit Foundation Hotel 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.