Forgings, iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills · Arkansas

Southwest Steel Processing

Newport, AR · ~107 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southwest Steel Processing runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Forgings, iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills workplace, earning a grade D.

Southwest Steel Processing: 6.4 TCR = 193% of Forgings, iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southwest Steel Processing safety composite

Southwest Steel Processing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2024

Southwest Steel Processing injury rate improved

Southwest Steel Processing's TCR fell 1.1 from 7.7 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.7 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Newport, AR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 193% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #14/14
  • PHOTO MSsteel
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MSsteel (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Southwest Steel Processing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southwest Steel Processing averages 6.4 TCR (193% of the Forgings, iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southwest Steel Processing TCR series: 2016=7.7 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Southwest Steel Processing falls in its industry

416 Forgings, iron or steel, made establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 14 Forgings, iron or steel, made employers in Arkansas.

Southwest Steel Processing (107 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Southwest Steel Processing
Southwest Steel Processing (107 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Southwest Steel Processing has fewer employees than the Forgings, iron or steel, made in iron an median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 2.6 5 0 0
2023 4.8 3.8 5 0 0
2022 6.5 4.3 8 1 0
2021 3.1 2.3 4 0 0
2020 4.7 2.8 5 0 0
2019 8.2 2.8 11 1 0
2018 8.4 3.1 8 0 0
2017 7.3 1.0 7 0 0
2016 7.7 2.2 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · AR · Newport

416 Forgings, iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 23 employers in Newport, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MSsteel 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valbruna Slater Stainless, Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR KYOEI STEEL AMERICA, LLC 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairfield Works - Flat Rolled 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE WHITE BLUFF PLANT 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE DC8 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4654 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unit # 0663 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shearer's Foods - Newport 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shearer's Foods - NPT 334 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arkansas Steel Associates, LLC 269 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Health Harris Medical Center 212 FTE
NAT-TCR Crownover Lumber Company, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hendrick Center for Rehabilitation 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR DNP Imagingcomm America 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR IKEA Tacoma DC 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Keefe Edison 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Claude Howard Lumber Company 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fremont 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE 017-FTW 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.