Ribbons, inked, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

DNP Imagingcomm America

Mount Pleasant, PA · ~167 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DNP Imagingcomm America runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Ribbons, inked, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

DNP Imagingcomm America: 6.4 TCR = 193% of Ribbons, inked, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DNP Imagingcomm America safety composite

DNP Imagingcomm America scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

DNP Imagingcomm America held a steady TCR band

DNP Imagingcomm America's TCR held near 0.1 from 4.2 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=6.5 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=9.5 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339940 · Mount Pleasant, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 193% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #9/10
  • PHOTO Stampin' Up! Kanab
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 98 inj
  • SIZE ~167 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stampin' Up! Kanab (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

DNP Imagingcomm America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DNP Imagingcomm America averages 6.4 TCR (193% of the Ribbons, inked, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DNP Imagingcomm America TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=6.5 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=9.5 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where DNP Imagingcomm America falls in its industry

56 Ribbons, inked, manufacturing establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 10 Ribbons, inked, manufacturing employers in Pennsylvania.

DNP Imagingcomm America (167 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate DNP Imagingcomm America
DNP Imagingcomm America (167 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.4

DNP Imagingcomm America has more employees than the Ribbons, inked, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 1.9 7 0 0
2023 9.5 5.8 13 0 0
2022 7.3 4.8 12 0 0
2021 6.6 3.8 12 0 0
2020 7.2 3.9 13 0 0
2019 6.2 2.6 11 1 0
2018 5.5 4.0 10 1 0
2017 6.5 4.0 12 1 0
2016 4.2 1.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339940 · PA · Mount Pleasant

56 Ribbons, inked, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 23 employers in Mount Pleasant, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stampin' Up! Kanab 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pen Company of America 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industries for the Blind and Visually Impaired, Inc. - Menomonee Falls 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LaRose Industries LLC dba Cra-z-art (Rose Moon) 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rice Fruit Company 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brothers 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wellington Power Corporation 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA PA Cranberry Township 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2611 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2611 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cenveo Worldwide Limited Mt Pleasant 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philips RIMP 304 FTE
NAT-TCR Hendrick Center for Rehabilitation 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwest Steel Processing 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Crownover Lumber Company, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ACA - Avery Shop/Yard 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE TEAM Industries - Andrews 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monarch Paving 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schilling Distributing Company, L.L.C. 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Excel Electrical Technologies, Inc. 167 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.