Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · South Carolina

Spartanburg Water Maintenance

Spartanburg, SC · ~109 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spartanburg Water Maintenance runs at 241% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Spartanburg Water Maintenance: 6.7 TCR = 241% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spartanburg Water Maintenance safety composite

Spartanburg Water Maintenance scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Spartanburg Water Maintenance: 7.6 → 14.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 14.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.77× in 2021

Spartanburg Water Maintenance's TCR rose 6.8 from 7.6 in 2018 to 14.3 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Spartanburg, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 241% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #19/21
  • PHOTO Stenstrom Excavation…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stenstrom Excavation & Blacktop Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Spartanburg Water Maintenance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spartanburg Water Maintenance averages 6.7 TCR (241% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spartanburg Water Maintenance TCR series: 2018=7.6 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=14.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Spartanburg Water Maintenance falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 21 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in South Carolina.

Spartanburg Water Maintenance (109 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Spartanburg Water Maintenance
Spartanburg Water Maintenance (109 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Spartanburg Water Maintenance has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 14.3 5.2 4 7 0
2020 2.6 0.9 3 0 0
2019 2.4 1.8 3 1 0
2018 7.6 3.8 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · SC · Spartanburg

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 294 employers in Spartanburg, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stenstrom Excavation & Blacktop Group 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mid City Corporation 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR RJV Construction Corp. 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR JOSEPH W DAVIS INC 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Celanese - Enoree Facility 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Insulfab Plastics, Inc. SC Division 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oldcastle Building Envelope 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ardagh Metal Packaging - Bishopville 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPARTANBURG FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg Medical Center 5,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg County 1,633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg County Government 1,561 FTE
NAT-TCR Diamond Central 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Foundation Park ACC 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Seneca Millworks Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR GFL Environmental Recycling - Royal Oak, MI 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Checkers- Justrite Safety Group- Broomfield 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rice Lake Elementary School 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elk Grove Plant 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ft Worth CCA 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.