Screen printing apparel and textile products (e.g. caps, napkins, placemats, T-shirts, towels) (except grey goods) · Minnesota

Spectrum

Plymouth, MN · ~43 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spectrum runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Screen printing apparel and textile products (e.g. caps, napkins, placemats, T-shirts, towels) (except grey goods) workplace, earning a grade A.

Spectrum: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Screen printing apparel and textile products (e.g. caps, napkins, placemats, T-shirts, towels) (except grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spectrum safety composite

Spectrum scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Spectrum held a steady TCR band

Spectrum's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323113 · Plymouth, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/17
  • PHOTO CUSTOM PRINTING II LTD
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CUSTOM PRINTING II LTD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Spectrum in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spectrum averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Screen printing apparel and textile products (e.g. caps, napkins, placemats, T-shirts, towels) (except grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spectrum TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Spectrum falls in its industry

200 Screen printing apparel and te establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 17 Screen printing apparel and te employers in Minnesota.

Spectrum (43 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Spectrum
Spectrum (43 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Spectrum has fewer employees than the Screen printing apparel and textile prod median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323113 · MN · Plymouth

200 Screen printing apparel and textile products (e.g. caps, napkins, placemats, T-shirts, towels) (except grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 321 employers in Plymouth, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CUSTOM PRINTING II LTD 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DesignTex Maine 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chii Clothing Company Daytona Beach 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DIRT T SHIRTS inc 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Farmers Cooperative 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edina Service Center 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wigen Water Technologies 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - Central (MN) 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence Service LLC 3,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR EP SH Plymouth MN 2,084 FTE
CITY-NEAR EP / SH Plymouth MN 1,982 FTE
CITY-NEAR CN Plymouth 1,565 FTE
NAT-TCR Po2 - Procurement 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MWMPC Corp dba Mid-West Electric Co Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CA Office 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Santa Ynez Unit - Hondo 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clayton Supply Haleyville 1 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ndx Perry and Young Dental Lab 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jacksonville- CF 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yarringtion Mills 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.