Teeth (except customized) manufacturing · California

Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc.

Loomis, CA · ~48 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc. runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Teeth (except customized) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc.: 0.2 TCR = 7% of Teeth (except customized) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc.: 0.0 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.7 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339114 · Loomis, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/19
  • PHOTO Jensen Industries
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jensen Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc. averages 0.2 TCR (7% of the Teeth (except customized) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

111 Teeth (except customized) manu establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 19 Teeth (except customized) manu employers in California.

Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc. (48 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc.
Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc. (48 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Teeth (except customized) manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339114 · CA · Loomis

111 Teeth (except customized) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 22 employers in Loomis, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jensen Industries 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dentsply Sirona 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BAE Systems, Inc. SJC 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Claire Manufacturing 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE ARVIN PRODUCTION & ADMIN 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rava Business Park 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guerrero Transportation & Contracting Inc 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE VPS, Inc 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Apex Construction Group, Inc. - Loomis 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR Madera Framing, Inc 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Engineering Contractors, Inc. 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raley's 231-Loomis 91 FTE
NAT-TCR Dow Chemical - Michgian Operations 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR BASF Agricultural Solutions 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR BCBSNC Madison Park Bldg 5660 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Aerospace : Ogden 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 50058 Capstone - Hd Pittston Pa 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Artcraft Co., Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trebor International 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ozarks Go, LLC 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.