Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) · Massachusetts

The Artcraft Co., Inc.

North Attleboro, MA · ~48 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Artcraft Co., Inc. runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) workplace, earning a grade B.

The Artcraft Co., Inc.: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Artcraft Co., Inc. safety composite

The Artcraft Co., Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Artcraft Co., Inc. held a steady TCR band

The Artcraft Co., Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · North Attleboro, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/40
  • PHOTO 5697_12498
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 5697_12498 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

The Artcraft Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Artcraft Co., Inc. averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Artcraft Co., Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where The Artcraft Co., Inc. falls in its industry

2,001 Offset printing (except books, establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 40 Offset printing (except books, employers in Massachusetts.

The Artcraft Co., Inc. (48 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate The Artcraft Co., Inc.
The Artcraft Co., Inc. (48 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

The Artcraft Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Offset printing (except books, printing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 0 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 7.9 7.9 2 2 0
2017 3.9 3.9 1 1 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MA · North Attleboro

2,001 Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 44 employers in North Attleboro, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 5697_12498 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kansas City (Headquarters) 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carlson Print Group 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CL&D Graphics Rock Hill 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Payne|Bouchier Inc 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rise Construction Management 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE NA-US-MA-South Dennis-Western Boulevard 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plymouth MA 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hockomock Area YMCA 597 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2366 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2366 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1190 - North Attleborough 219 FTE
NAT-TCR Columbus SW Svc Ctr 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rohm Building & Development, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lanier Color Company, Inc 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Traichal Construction Co / DBA Warren Door 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE MBKT Corp 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sprig Oral Health Technologies, Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE 50058 Capstone - Hd Pittston Pa 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Western Malting Pocatello 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.