Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Maryland

Spring Arbor of Crofton

Crofton, MD · ~74 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spring Arbor of Crofton runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Spring Arbor of Crofton: 4.7 TCR = 123% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spring Arbor of Crofton safety composite

Spring Arbor of Crofton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2022→2024

Spring Arbor of Crofton injury rate improved

Spring Arbor of Crofton's TCR fell 7.5 from 10.1 in 2022 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=10.1 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Crofton, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 123% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #24/79
  • PHOTO Millbrae Assisted Li…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Millbrae Assisted Living LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Spring Arbor of Crofton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spring Arbor of Crofton averages 4.7 TCR (123% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spring Arbor of Crofton TCR series: 2022=10.1 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Spring Arbor of Crofton falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 79 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Maryland.

Spring Arbor of Crofton (74 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Spring Arbor of Crofton
Spring Arbor of Crofton (74 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Spring Arbor of Crofton has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2023 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2022 10.1 8.9 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MD · Crofton

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 27 employers in Crofton, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Millbrae Assisted Living LLC 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Waterford at Creekside 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gardens of Scottsdale 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chillum Station 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consolidated Commercial Services, LLC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warfield & Sanford, Inc. 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Insualtion, Inc. 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pritchard Sports and Entertainment Group, LLC 844 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx 2130 BALDWIN AVENUE 249 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crofton Convalescent Centr Inc 227 FTE
CITY-NEAR GIANT 2330 185 FTE
NAT-TCR District Kitchen + Cocktails North 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Autism Learning Partners NOC-SOC-Orange County 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 751-PL001 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 7896-Pdllc-Simons Rock 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE SEA Logistics LLC 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southeastern Indiana REMC 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jackson 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Natural Soda LLC 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.