Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Virginia

Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg

Fredericksburg, VA · ~66 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg runs at 361% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg: 13.7 TCR = 361% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg safety composite

Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg: 13.4 → 16.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 16.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.86× in 2024

Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg's TCR rose 2.8 from 13.4 in 2022 to 16.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fredericksburg, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.7 · 361% of ind

  • DART 11.8 DART
  • RANK #161/199
  • PHOTO Bethesda Gardens of …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bethesda Gardens of Phoenix (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg averages 13.7 TCR (361% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg TCR series: 2022=13.4 · 2023=11.6 · 2024=16.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #161 safest of 199 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Virginia.

Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg (66 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg
Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg (66 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.2 11.8 11 0 0
2023 11.6 8.7 8 0 0
2022 13.4 13.4 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Fredericksburg

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 279 employers in Fredericksburg, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bethesda Gardens of Phoenix 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lima, Elmcroft of 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Salem 13.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blue Ridge 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE D&D Mechanical, Inc. 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY SCHOOLS 2,863 FTE
CITY-NEAR MARY WASHINGTON HOSPITAL 1,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR GERMANNA COMMUNITY COLLEGE 865 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brookdale Fredericksburg 848 FTE
NAT-TCR Coloma Garage - Mdot 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 196 - CRD Austin 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Drumlin Dairy, LLC 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Baptist Village 13.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Applewood Centers - Children's Aid Society & Gerson School 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Excelsior Inc 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE D&H United Fueling Solutions, Inc - El Paso Tx 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE #22 Chuck'S Mp 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.