Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New York

Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge

Spring Valley, NY · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge runs at 361% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge: 13.7 TCR = 361% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge safety composite

Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.3

2021→2024

Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge injury rate improved

Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge's TCR fell 16.3 from 19.2 in 2021 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 67.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=19.2 · 2022=67.0 · 2023=19.0 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Spring Valley, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.7 · 361% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #255/283
  • PHOTO Brookdale Salem
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Salem (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge averages 13.7 TCR (361% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge TCR series: 2021=19.2 · 2022=67 · 2023=19 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #255 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge (34 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge
Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge (34 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Artis Senior Living of Chestnut Ridge has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2023 19.0 0.0 6 0 0
2022 67.0 67.0 3 18 0
2021 19.2 19.2 1 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NY · Spring Valley

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 19 employers in Spring Valley, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Salem 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inverness at Spartanburg 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Myrtle Beach Grove Senior Living 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Mt. Hood 13.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reeves Farms LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glenview Dairy LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ashland Farm LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Porterdale Farms Inc. 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR O&R SVOC 584 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chestnut Ridge Transportation 510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pine Valley Center LLC 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pine Valley Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing 261 FTE
NAT-TCR D4 Peoria Yard 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bella Terra Morton Grove 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Grocery Outlet of Arroyo Grande 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TW Ridley LLC 13.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE JM Aviation 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Adventist Hcw Selma 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neese District Jackson EMC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Shenandoah Univ Catering 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.