Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing · Michigan

Spring Dynamics, Inc.

Almont, MI · ~37 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spring Dynamics, Inc. runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Spring Dynamics, Inc.: 1.5 TCR = 45% of Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spring Dynamics, Inc. safety composite

Spring Dynamics, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2017→2021

Spring Dynamics, Inc. injury rate improved

Spring Dynamics, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332613 · Almont, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 45% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/16
  • PHOTO Tokusen HyTech Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tokusen HyTech Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Spring Dynamics, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spring Dynamics, Inc. averages 1.5 TCR (45% of the Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spring Dynamics, Inc. TCR series: 2017=4.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Spring Dynamics, Inc. falls in its industry

189 Coiled springs (except clock, establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 16 Coiled springs (except clock, employers in Michigan.

Spring Dynamics, Inc. (37 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Spring Dynamics, Inc.
Spring Dynamics, Inc. (37 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Spring Dynamics, Inc. has fewer employees than the Coiled springs (except clock, watch), li median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.7 2.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332613 · MI · Almont

189 Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 5 employers in Almont, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tokusen HyTech Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NHK of America 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suhm Spring of Dallas 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daewon America #3 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Full Circle Dairy 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dakota Plains Dairy 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE East River Genetic Services LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iron Mountain Hydro 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legacy Metal Services, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shop 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aristo-Cast Inc 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2453-00060327-000117 21 FTE
NAT-TCR Diamond Plastics Corp - Plaquemine 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kirby Risk Electrical Supply Peoria 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sutter Health System Office (470-22) 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ITL- Ohio 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brandl Chevrolet Buick GMC 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chic Event Rentals 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winsupply Jacksonville DC LLC 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Rosemount Public Works 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.