Retirement communities, continuing care · California

Spring Lake Village

Santa Rosa, CA · ~260 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spring Lake Village runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Spring Lake Village: 6.7 TCR = 176% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spring Lake Village safety composite

Spring Lake Village scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2017→2024

Spring Lake Village injury rate improved

Spring Lake Village's TCR fell 3.8 from 7.0 in 2017 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.0 · 2018=11.3 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=4.7 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Santa Rosa, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.7 · 176% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #70/216
  • PHOTO Legend at Council Road
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 88 inj
  • SIZE ~260 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Legend at Council Road (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Spring Lake Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spring Lake Village averages 6.7 TCR (176% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spring Lake Village TCR series: 2017=7 · 2018=11.3 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=4.7 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Spring Lake Village falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 216 Retirement communities, contin employers in California.

Spring Lake Village (260 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Spring Lake Village
Spring Lake Village (260 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Spring Lake Village has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 2.7 6 0 0
2023 8.5 6.8 15 0 0
2022 5.1 4.6 9 1 0
2020 4.7 0.5 5 5 0
2019 6.9 5.3 17 0 0
2018 11.3 11.3 23 1 0
2017 7.0 5.2 13 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Santa Rosa

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 344 employers in Santa Rosa, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Legend at Council Road 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brandywine Living 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Homestead at Rochester 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Querencia Barton Creek 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pacific Petroleum California Inc 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHATSWORTH - 15 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE O'Bryant Electric shop 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE FUJI FOOD PRODUCTS, INC. 260 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 543 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121251 2,209 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-00001480 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA720 SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL HR 1,806 FTE
NAT-TCR Halvor Lines Rosemount 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Red Wing Shoe Co. - Salt Lake City 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jefferson County nursing home 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Roswell 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ctnor - North Haven 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inelk - Elkhart 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wavan - Vancouver 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company 260 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.