Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

Spring Mill Pointe

Lafayette Hill, PA · ~73 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spring Mill Pointe runs at 270% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Spring Mill Pointe: 8.1 TCR = 270% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spring Mill Pointe safety composite

Spring Mill Pointe scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2020→2023

Spring Mill Pointe injury rate improved

Spring Mill Pointe's TCR fell 3.2 from 10.4 in 2020 to 7.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=10.4 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=12.6 · 2023=7.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Lafayette Hill, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 270% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #402/463
  • PHOTO 4021-610843300
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4021-610843300 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Spring Mill Pointe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spring Mill Pointe averages 8.1 TCR (270% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spring Mill Pointe TCR series: 2020=10.4 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=12.6 · 2023=7.2 · BLS 3.0

Where Spring Mill Pointe falls in its industry

6,952 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #402 safest of 463 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Spring Mill Pointe (73 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Spring Mill Pointe
Spring Mill Pointe (73 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Spring Mill Pointe has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.2 2.4 3 0 0
2022 12.6 7.5 5 0 0
2021 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2020 10.4 10.4 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · PA · Lafayette Hill

6,952 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 15 employers in Lafayette Hill, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4021-610843300 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palm Beach County 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legends - Klipsch Music Center 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT SCSU CONNECTICUT HALL 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE McMurray Operations 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Philly Schuylkill 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wohlsen Construction Self Perform 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meadowview Rehab and Nursing 323 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whitemarsh Continuing Care Retirement Community 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meadowview Rehab and Nursing ctr 303 FTE
NAT-TCR Simi Base - Bld: 0743 - 15 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR West Hills Hospital & Medical Center 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Oshkosh Door Company 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Southview - Willows of Arbor Lakes 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Downey Base - Bld: 0360 - 15 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bridge Home Health East Bay, LLC. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Market of Choice Store #10 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Callico Distributors, Inc 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.