Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Spring Senior Assisted Living

Torrance, CA · ~27 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spring Senior Assisted Living runs at 147% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Spring Senior Assisted Living: 5.6 TCR = 147% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spring Senior Assisted Living safety composite

Spring Senior Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Spring Senior Assisted Living held a steady TCR band

Spring Senior Assisted Living's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 27.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=27.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Torrance, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 147% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #130/635
  • PHOTO StoneBridge of Heber…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Spring Senior Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spring Senior Assisted Living averages 5.6 TCR (147% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spring Senior Assisted Living TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=27.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Spring Senior Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #130 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Spring Senior Assisted Living (27 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Spring Senior Assisted Living
Spring Senior Assisted Living (27 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Spring Senior Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 27.9 16.0 7 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Torrance

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 332 employers in Torrance, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Roseville 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Hanover House 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WPAL 2015, LLC 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE HQ 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medeiros Farms Vineyards 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAND RANCH 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Bernabe Vineyards 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harbor-UCLA Medical Center 4,144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Torrance Memorial Medical Center 3,808 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 494 2,621 FTE
NAT-TCR Eich Motor Co., Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Village Plaza Sparkle 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Protecto Wrap Cherokee Warehouse 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Blake Drilling Company, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store 1056 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE C-20-0010 Lock & Dam 53 Demolition 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE LMMM Houston #80, LTD 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE ReEnergy Black River 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.