Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arkansas

StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs

Heber Springs, AR · ~64 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs runs at 147% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs: 5.6 TCR = 147% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs safety composite

StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2018→2024

StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs injury rate improved

StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs's TCR fell 3.9 from 6.7 in 2018 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.7 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Heber Springs, AR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 147% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #31/51
  • PHOTO Ivy Park at Roseville
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ivy Park at Roseville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs averages 5.6 TCR (147% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs TCR series: 2018=6.7 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.8

Where StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 51 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arkansas.

StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs (64 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs
StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs (64 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.1 3.6 2 0 0
2021 5.9 2.9 2 0 0
2020 9.3 7.0 4 0 0
2019 7.3 2.4 3 0 0
2018 6.7 6.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AR · Heber Springs

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 19 employers in Heber Springs, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Roseville 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Hanover House 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WPAL 2015, LLC 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village on the Park Rogers 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE LR-Port 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE BHGAR - Lowell (AR016) 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jonesboro Roofing Co., Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fureigh Electric 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Jean Industries 422 FTE
CITY-NEAR NDX Green 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR NDX GREEN LABORATORIES 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR Defiance Metal Products: Heber Springs, AR 202 FTE
NAT-TCR Patti Marine Enterprises, Inc 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Piping Service Inc 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HSN Piney Flats 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Murray Builders, LLC d.b.a. Murray Company 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Pine Aggregate, Inc. 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastside Rd 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Luhrs CM, LLC. 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cubbison Company 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.