Homes for the elderly with nursing care · South Dakota

Springfield Assisted Living Center

Springfield, SD · ~29 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Springfield Assisted Living Center runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade B.

Springfield Assisted Living Center: 4.2 TCR = 64% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Springfield Assisted Living Center safety composite

Springfield Assisted Living Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2017→2024

Springfield Assisted Living Center injury rate improved

Springfield Assisted Living Center's TCR fell 6.1 from 13.3 in 2017 to 7.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.3 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=7.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Springfield, SD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.2 · 64% of ind

  • DART 7.1 DART
  • RANK #14/107
  • PHOTO Grand Meadow
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grand Meadow (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Springfield Assisted Living Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Springfield Assisted Living Center averages 4.2 TCR (64% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Springfield Assisted Living Center TCR series: 2017=13.3 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=7.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Springfield Assisted Living Center falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 107 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in South Dakota.

Springfield Assisted Living Center (29 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Springfield Assisted Living Center
Springfield Assisted Living Center (29 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Springfield Assisted Living Center has fewer employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.1 7.1 1 0 0
2023 7.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 13.3 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · SD · Springfield

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,778 rated employers in South Dakota with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grand Meadow 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avenue at Wooster 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windham House 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lincoln Hills Care Center 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bees South Dakota 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lacreek Electric Association, Inc. 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quinn Construction, Inc. 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ace Ready Mix- Sioux Falls 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rush Company Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-TCR Southern Dimensions Group, Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sokol Inc 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Allied Mineral Products - Pell City 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bernardus Winery 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pratt & Whitney Line Maintenance Services (PW LMS) 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oleson's Food Store 606 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 401 Lincoln Ave 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Ammunition Container, Inc. 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.