Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) · Massachusetts

Springfield Label & Tape

Springfield, MA · ~31 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Springfield Label & Tape runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) workplace, earning a grade F.

Springfield Label & Tape: 8.2 TCR = 249% of Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Springfield Label & Tape safety composite

Springfield Label & Tape scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2017→2024

Springfield Label & Tape injury rate improved

Springfield Label & Tape's TCR fell 2.5 from 9.4 in 2017 to 6.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.4 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=7.5 · 2022=15.2 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=6.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Springfield, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 249% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #39/40
  • PHOTO Building 3
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Building 3 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Springfield Label & Tape in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Springfield Label & Tape averages 8.2 TCR (249% of the Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Springfield Label & Tape TCR series: 2017=9.4 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=7.5 · 2022=15.2 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=6.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Springfield Label & Tape falls in its industry

2,001 Print shops, flexographic (exc establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 40 Print shops, flexographic (exc employers in Massachusetts.

Springfield Label & Tape (31 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Springfield Label & Tape
Springfield Label & Tape (31 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Springfield Label & Tape has fewer employees than the Print shops, flexographic (except printi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.9 3.5 2 0 0
2023 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2022 15.2 7.6 3 1 0
2020 7.5 0.0 1 1 0
2019 6.9 6.9 2 0 0
2017 9.4 4.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MA · Springfield

2,001 Print shops, flexographic (except printing books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 215 employers in Springfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Building 3 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Flexo Corp. 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR KTP Charlotte 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Anstadt Company 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE MILLBURY LEARNING CENTER-MA22 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE One Tech Circle 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raffles Unit 28C 40 Trinity Place 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Biotech Builders Group 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMC - Baystate Medical Center 8,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMP - Baystate Medical Practices 1,977 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Tarp Redevelopment, LLC d/b/a MGM Springfield 1,867 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMF - Baystate Medical Practices 1,746 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Jackson Mem Main Sdx Mgc 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Viking SupplyNet & Fabrication Services - Doraville 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Springbrook NY Inc - Bird Ave 775 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tucson 298 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sheboygan 186 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colorado Springs 256 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE TSS at Honeywell International Inc Geismar LA 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.