Hotels (except casino hotels) · Washington

SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah

Issaquah, WA · ~31 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade D.

SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah: 5.2 TCR = 172% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah safety composite

SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah: 0.0 → 4.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 12.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah's TCR rose 4.6 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 12.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Issaquah, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 172% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #96/172
  • PHOTO Pagosa Springs
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pagosa Springs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah averages 5.2 TCR (172% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=9 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=12.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 3.0

Where SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #96 safest of 172 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in Washington.

SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah (31 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah
SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah (31 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah has fewer employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 5.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 12.8 0.0 1 1 0
2020 5.8 5.8 1 0 0
2019 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2018 9.0 9.0 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · WA · Issaquah

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 76 employers in Issaquah, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pagosa Springs 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inn & Spa at Loretto 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kimpton Hotel Alma 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCR Denver South Tenant LLC 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Freese Management LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cleveringa Farms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nespelem 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE R L Smith Logging Inc 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000225 1,289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastpointe 1,185 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHS, Issaquah Campus 882 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0110 - ISSAQUAH WA WHSE 473 FTE
NAT-TCR Formtek Inc 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Acrotech Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Graetz Mfg Inc 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bradley Stone Industries 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wakou USA Hq 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE CPE 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haviland Care Center 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Molten Metal Equipment Innovations LLC 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.