Bars, steel, made in cold rolling mills made from purchased steel · Minnesota

SSAB Minnesota Inc.

Roseville, MN · ~35 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SSAB Minnesota Inc. runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bars, steel, made in cold rolling mills made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade C.

SSAB Minnesota Inc.: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Bars, steel, made in cold rolling mills made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SSAB Minnesota Inc. safety composite

SSAB Minnesota Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2016→2024

SSAB Minnesota Inc. injury rate improved

SSAB Minnesota Inc.'s TCR fell 6.6 from 6.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.6 · 2017=9.2 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · Roseville, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P63
  • PHOTO R&N Manufacturing, L…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: R&N Manufacturing, LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

SSAB Minnesota Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SSAB Minnesota Inc. averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Bars, steel, made in cold rolling mills made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SSAB Minnesota Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.6 · 2017=9.2 · 2018=3 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where SSAB Minnesota Inc. falls in its industry

206 Bars, steel, made in cold roll establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
SSAB Minnesota Inc. (35 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SSAB Minnesota Inc.
SSAB Minnesota Inc. (35 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

SSAB Minnesota Inc. has fewer employees than the Bars, steel, made in cold rolling mills median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2017 9.2 6.2 3 0 0
2016 6.6 3.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · MN · Roseville

206 Bars, steel, made in cold rolling mills made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 239 employers in Roseville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR R&N Manufacturing, LLC. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BILSTEIN COLD ROLLED STEEL LLP 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Louis Cold Drawn, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calstrip Steel California 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dollymount 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scotch Prairie Farms LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genex Farm Systems Melrose 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Dog Power Plant 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro District 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR Park Dental/The Dental Specialist 1,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Veritas Technologies LLC - Roseville 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2101 - Roseville T1 509 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Lee University 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Jackson Beh Health Sdx Mgc 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Location 34 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dgdg 13, LLC 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Award Concepts, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nor-Cal Scaffolding Inc 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Energy Mechanical Insulation, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE KNF Jersey City 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.