Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

St. Benedict's Senior Community Monticello

Monticello, MN · ~77 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Benedict's Senior Community Monticello runs at 352% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

St. Benedict's Senior Community Monticello: 13.4 TCR = 352% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Benedict's Senior Community Monticello safety composite

St. Benedict's Senior Community Monticello scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2017→2018

St. Benedict's Senior Community Monticello injury rate improved

St. Benedict's Senior Community Monticello's TCR fell 2.5 from 14.6 in 2017 to 12.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.6 · 2018=12.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Monticello, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.4 · 352% of ind

  • DART 12.1 DART
  • RANK #177/226
  • PHOTO Alexis Estates
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alexis Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

St. Benedict's Senior Community Monticello in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Benedict's Senior Community Monticello averages 13.4 TCR (352% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Benedict's Senior Community Monticello TCR series: 2017=14.6 · 2018=12.1 · BLS 3.8

Where St. Benedict's Senior Community Monticello falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #177 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

St. Benedict's Senior Community Monticello (77 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Benedict's Senior Community Monticello
St. Benedict's Senior Community Monticello (77 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

St. Benedict's Senior Community Monticello has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 12.1 12.1 6 0 0
2017 14.6 12.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Monticello

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 70 employers in Monticello, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alexis Estates 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silverado Alexandria - 470 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakwood Village Assisted Living 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bayshore Memory Care 13.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE St Cloud Service Center-LB 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shaw-Lundquist Associates, Inc. Eagan office 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linco Fab, Inc 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dist Office 599 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monticello High School 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCH Monticello 571 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare Monticello 487 FTE
NAT-TCR Tradewater Health and Rehab 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Arrow Container Warehouse Location 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 056315-Rancho Cordova Po 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 160636-Bellwood Po 13.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alpin Haus Ski Shop 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE GDIT Pawcatuck Mechanic St 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Action Resources - Theodore 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forte Products - Farmington 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.