Recyclable material collection services · Ohio

St. Bernard Hauling Operations

Cincinnati, OH · ~140 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Bernard Hauling Operations runs at 455% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Recyclable material collection services workplace, earning a grade F.

St. Bernard Hauling Operations: 11.8 TCR = 455% of Recyclable material collection services BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Bernard Hauling Operations safety composite

St. Bernard Hauling Operations scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

St. Bernard Hauling Operations: 7.2 → 14.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 16.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.14× in 2023

St. Bernard Hauling Operations's TCR rose 6.8 from 7.2 in 2016 to 14.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 16.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Cincinnati, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 455% of ind

  • DART 13.5 DART
  • RANK #52/56
  • PHOTO Al Clawson Disposal …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 164 inj
  • SIZE ~140 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Al Clawson Disposal Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

St. Bernard Hauling Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Bernard Hauling Operations averages 11.8 TCR (455% of the Recyclable material collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Bernard Hauling Operations TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=15.8 · 2018=12.8 · 2019=16.4 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=11.1 · 2022=9.9 · 2023=14 · BLS 2.6

Where St. Bernard Hauling Operations falls in its industry

2,322 Recyclable material collection establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 56 Recyclable material collection employers in Ohio.

St. Bernard Hauling Operations (140 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Bernard Hauling Operations
St. Bernard Hauling Operations (140 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

St. Bernard Hauling Operations has more employees than the Recyclable material collection services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 14.0 13.5 27 0 0
2022 9.9 8.5 20 2 0
2021 11.1 8.4 20 1 0
2020 7.6 5.5 15 0 0
2019 16.4 12.9 28 0 0
2018 12.8 9.7 21 0 0
2017 15.8 12.3 22 1 0
2016 7.2 5.2 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · OH · Cincinnati

2,322 Recyclable material collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Al Clawson Disposal Inc 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NJRC 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR S04100 - WM of St Louis - West 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR S03220 - WM of Northern Colorado - Estes Park 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dummen Orange 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Feazel Roofing, LLC 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cinfab 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE CANTON LOCATION 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Machine Division 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wisconsin Truss 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Water 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR FSI Acoustical Systems LLC 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Filtration : Lancaster EMHFF 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Contract Filling Inc 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Fitness Falmouth 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE University Loft 140 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.