Homes for the aged with nursing care · Wisconsin

St. Francis Home

Fond Du Lac, WI · ~244 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Francis Home runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Homes for the aged with nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

St. Francis Home: 8.8 TCR = 136% of Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Francis Home safety composite

St. Francis Home scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

St. Francis Home held a steady TCR band

St. Francis Home's TCR held near 0.1 from 8.6 in 2016 to 8.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.6 · 2017=13.8 · 2018=8.5 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=8.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Fond Du Lac, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.8 · 136% of ind

  • DART 6.9 DART
  • RANK #266/355
  • PHOTO Appaloosa Healthcare…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 98 inj
  • SIZE ~244 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Appaloosa Healthcare, Inc. DBA Crestwood Health and Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

St. Francis Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Francis Home averages 8.8 TCR (136% of the Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Francis Home TCR series: 2016=8.6 · 2017=13.8 · 2018=8.5 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=8.5 · BLS 6.5

Where St. Francis Home falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursin establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #266 safest of 355 Homes for the aged with nursin employers in Wisconsin.

St. Francis Home (244 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Francis Home
St. Francis Home (244 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

St. Francis Home has more employees than the Homes for the aged with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.5 6.9 11 0 0
2021 6.6 4.6 10 0 0
2020 8.6 4.3 14 0 0
2019 7.2 3.0 12 0 0
2018 8.5 3.6 14 0 0
2017 13.8 6.0 23 0 0
2016 8.6 4.9 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · WI · Fond Du Lac

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 134 employers in Fond Du Lac, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Appaloosa Healthcare, Inc. DBA Crestwood Health and Rehabilitation Center 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR F85 PETERS TOWNSHIP SKILLED NURSING REHAB 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mesa Springs Healthcare Center 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wolfeboro Bay Center 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waukesha Office 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lee Mechanical 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE ICM Corporation 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE Traffic & Parking Control Company 244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercury Marine FdL Campus 3,778 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercury Marine Fond du Lac 3,735 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ahern Fond du Lac - Corporate 1,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Agnes Hospital 1,479 FTE
NAT-TCR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-03554 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02386 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0005-0005-03723 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0033-0033-03581 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Exton, PA 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2904-SAS-KS 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anvil Builders 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-NAI-0032-0032-03223 244 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.