MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · New York

St. Joseph's Medical PC

Liverpool, NY · ~340 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Joseph's Medical PC runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade B.

St. Joseph's Medical PC: 2.4 TCR = 63% of MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Joseph's Medical PC safety composite

St. Joseph's Medical PC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2017

St. Joseph's Medical PC injury rate improved

St. Joseph's Medical PC's TCR fell 1.9 from 3.3 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.3 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Liverpool, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #77/197
  • PHOTO Cherry Hill - 1945 R…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~340 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cherry Hill - 1945 Route 70 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

St. Joseph's Medical PC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Joseph's Medical PC averages 2.4 TCR (63% of the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Joseph's Medical PC TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=1.4 · BLS 3.8

Where St. Joseph's Medical PC falls in its industry

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 197 MDs' (medical doctors, except employers in New York.

St. Joseph's Medical PC (340 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Joseph's Medical PC
St. Joseph's Medical PC (340 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

St. Joseph's Medical PC has more employees than the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental hea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 1.4 0.0 2 1 0
2016 3.3 1.0 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · NY · Liverpool

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 141 employers in Liverpool, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cherry Hill - 1945 Route 70 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chestnut Hill Clinic Co LLC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter East Bay Medical Foundation (227-261) 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CN - Flourtown 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kennedy Valve Company 340 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1070 - REGO PARK NY WHSE 340 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pictometry International Corp. 340 FTE
STATE-SIZE Massena Hospital 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raymour & Flanigan Furniture 6,273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NY Syracuse Electroncs Pkwy (1021) 2,126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Syracuse Campus (1021) 1,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advocates Incorporated 1,030 FTE
NAT-TCR CCNA - Dunedin Juice Plant 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Line Affiliates 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Towing 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockwell Automation- Memphis TN (MTN) 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Provo Center (Utore) 340 FTE
NAT-SIZE Menlo Park (Camen) 340 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jet.com FC-6923 340 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazonas Administration 340 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.