Commercial building construction general contractors · Minnesota

Stahl Construction Company

Minneapolis, MN · ~27 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Stahl Construction Company runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Stahl Construction Company: 3.0 TCR = 102% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Stahl Construction Company safety composite

Stahl Construction Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.6

2017→2024

Stahl Construction Company injury rate improved

Stahl Construction Company's TCR fell 7.6 from 7.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.6 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 102% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #59/130
  • PHOTO Andy Johnson & Co Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Andy Johnson & Co Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Stahl Construction Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Stahl Construction Company averages 3.0 TCR (102% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Stahl Construction Company TCR series: 2017=7.6 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Stahl Construction Company falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 130 Commercial building constructi employers in Minnesota.

Stahl Construction Company (27 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Stahl Construction Company
Stahl Construction Company (27 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Stahl Construction Company has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 7.6 3.8 2 0 0
2017 7.6 3.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MN · Minneapolis

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Andy Johnson & Co Inc 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR G.O. Services, LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Construction 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Effingham 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Featherstone Fruits and Vegetables LLC. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forest City Feedmill 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms PAP MN 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2011-Stanton, MN 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Tomenson Machine Works 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Briggs Electric, Inc.-CA 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cockeysville 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Burlington Gen Station 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ptcr Greensboro 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jackson Generating Station 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Ring Manufacturing 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Recycling Charlotte 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.